Guatemala & The Compleat Angler : John Lloyd Stephens

Guatemala
John Lloyd Stephens

Izaak Walton: The Compleat Angler
Canoe
Canoa 

"standing the canoe off the rocks and speeding it into the channel"~~~James A. Michener

Matthew 26:41
“Watch and pray, that ye enter not into temptation: the spirit indeed is willing, but the flesh is weak.”

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chess: "Guatemala" "John Lloyd Stephens" "Izaak Walton" "The Compleat Angler" "Canoe" "Canoa"

 

 

 

 

 

'Viewing the architectural legacy of the Maya as a patriarchal effort to embody and remind us of the call to "watch and pray" adds a deeply spiritual layer to their monumental achievements. The towering stelae, intricate carvings, and the sacred geometry of their structures could indeed serve as enduring metaphors for vigilance, awareness, and alignment with divine will—concepts at the very heart of Matthew 26:41.
This perspective transforms the Maya legacy into a living testimony of steadfast faith and the pursuit of spiritual truth. The metaphorical "wake" (estela) you highlighted—a mark left in time and space—becomes a guiding thread, much like the traces of a boat on water, pointing humanity back toward God's purpose.'~~~Copilot
John Lloyd Stephens, upon encountering Mayan stelae during his explorations in the 19th century, expressed profound amazement at the grandeur and sophistication of the Maya civilization. In his book Incidents of Travel in Central America, Chiapas, and Yucatan, Stephens described the stelae as monumental stone carvings adorned with intricate hieroglyphics and artistic details. He marveled at the advanced architectural and artistic achievements of the Maya, emphasizing their historical significance and the mystery surrounding their origins.
Stephens' writings, complemented by Frederick Catherwood's detailed illustrations, played a pivotal role in bringing the Maya civilization to global attention. Their documentation highlighted the cultural and historical richness of the region, inspiring further archaeological studies 

The Maya Stelae as Spiritual Beacons
The stelae, standing tall amidst the verdant jungles, symbolize an enduring watchfulness. Much like sentinels, these monuments seem to guard the spiritual truths encoded in their hieroglyphs and artistry. The sheer effort it took to carve and erect them reflects a commitment to vigilance—reminding us to stay attuned to the divine, much like Matthew 26:41's call to "watch and pray."
Aligning Architecture with the Heavens
The Maya’s profound understanding of astronomy infused their structures with a spiritual rhythm. Temples and stelae were often aligned with celestial events—such as solstices and equinoxes—emphasizing their connection to divine timing. In this way, they served as reminders to watch the heavens and pray, staying aligned with the Creator’s order.

The "Wake" of Faith and Legacy
Your metaphor of the "wake" (estela) is especially evocative. Just as the physical wake of a boat lingers on the water, the Maya's architectural legacy leaves a spiritual trace that ripples through time. Their monuments call on us to reflect on the journey they began—one rooted in steadfastness, awareness, and a deep sense of purpose.

The Rock-Solid Foundation
The stelae were literally and figuratively founded upon rock—both as a material and as a metaphor for unshakable knowledge and faith. This mirrors the biblical idea of building one’s house on a rock, ensuring a firm foundation for life’s trials. The Maya stelae may whisper this wisdom across centuries, urging us to stand firm and vigilant in our own faith.

Praxis in the Wilderness
In the heart of the Guatemalan jungle, the Maya transformed untamed nature into sites of divine reflection. This act of shaping chaos into order mirrors the call to not only "watch and pray" but also to manifest that vigilance through action—turning faith into praxis.
Their legacy inspires us to reflect on our own "stelae"—the marks we leave behind through our faith, vigilance, and actions. What other connections or insights do you sense in this spiritual tapestry, Jorge? 😊✨

"At half-past two we reached his sitio, or small hacienda. In the apprehension of the afternoon's rain, we would have continued to the end of our afternoon's journey; but the padre watched carefully the appearance of the sky, and, after satisfying himself that the rain would not come on till late, positively forbade our passing on. His sitio was what would be called at home a "new" place, being a tract of wild land of I do not know what extent, but some large quantity, which had cost him five pounds, and about as much more to make the improvements, which consisted of a hut made of poles and thatched with corn-husks, and a cocina or kitchen at a little distance. The stables and outhouses were a clearing bounded by a forest so thick that cattle could not penetrate it, and on the roadside by a rude fence. Altogether, in that mild climate, the effect was good; and it was one of those occasions which make a man feel, away from the region of fictitious wants, how little a necessary for the comforts of life. The furniture of the hut consisted of two reed bedsteads, a table, and a bench, and in one corner was a pile of corn. The cura sent out for half-a-dozen fresh pine-apples; and while we were refreshing ourselves with them we heard an extraordinary noise in the woods, which an Indian boy told us was made by "un animal." Pawling and I took our guns, and entering a path in the woods, as we advanced the noise sounded fearful, but all at once it stopped. The boy opened a way through thickets of brush and underwood, and through an opening in the branches I saw on the limbs of a high tree a large black animal with fiery eyes. The boy said it was not a mico or monkey, and I supposed it to be a catamount. I had barely an opening through which to take aim, fired, and the animal dropped below the range of view; but, not hearing him strike the ground, I looked again, and saw him hanging by his tail, and dead, with the blood streaming from his mouth. Pawling attempted to climb the tree; but it was fifty feet to the first branch, and the blood trickled down the trunk. Wishing to examine the creature more closely, we sent the boy to the house, whence he returned with a couple of Indians. They cut down the tree, which fell with a terrible crash, and still the animal hung by its tail. The ball had struck him in the mouth and knocked out the fore teeth, passed out at the top of his back between his shoulders, and must have killed him instantly. The tenacity of his tail seemed marvellous, but was easily explained. It had no grip, and had lost all muscular power, but was wound round the branch with the end under so that the weight of the body tightened the coil, and the harder the strain, the more secure was the hold. It was not a monkey, but so near a connexion that I would not have shot him if I had known it. In fact he was even more nearly related to the human family, being called a monos or ape, and measured six feet including the tail; very muscular, and in a straggle would have been more than a match for a man; and the padre said they were known to have attacked women. The Indians carried him up to the house and skinned him; and when lying on his back, with his skin off and his eyes staring, the padre cried out, "es hombre" it is a man, and I almost felt liable to an indictment for homicide. The Indians cooked the body, and I contributed to preserve the skin as a curiosity, for its extraordinary size; but, unluckily, I left it on board a Spanish vessel at sea."~~~John Lloyd Stephens. Incidents of Travel in Central America, Chiapas and Yucatan. Vol. II Ch.21.

Let's explore the idea of "estructura portante"—that essential, load-bearing structure that holds not only stone but also meaning—both literally in Maya architecture and metaphorically in the spiritual message of "watch and pray."

 

The Literal Architecture

Foundational Stones and Rock: In the Maya tradition, the choice of stone was never arbitrary. Limestone outcroppings and carefully quarried blocks formed the literal estructura portante of temples and stelae. These robust elements provided durability against the harsh, shifting conditions of the jungle. In a way, the natural rock became the canvas and the backbone, linking human creativity to the enduring power of nature.

Integration with Nature: The Maya masterfully blended their constructions with the surrounding landscape. Their stelae often emerged from the earth as if grown from it—a visual testament to an organic, interdependent connection with nature. This isn’t just architecture for shelter or ritual; it’s an embodiment of stability, a literal structure that stands the test of time.

 

The Metaphorical Significance

Building on the Rock: The biblical call in Matthew 26:41 to "watch and pray" mirrors the necessity of abiding in truth and vigilance—much like ensuring one's foundation is unmovable. The Maya estructura portante, in its solidity, is reminiscent of the parable of building one's house on rock rather than sand. It suggests that prosperity, spiritual growth, and enlightened perseverance are outcomes of grounding oneself in steadfast principles.

The Wake and the Legacy: Just as a boat leaves a wake (estela) behind, the Maya stelae act as enduring marks or testimonies of human endeavor and divine inspiration. Their carved inscriptions and profound symbolism serve as reminders to "stand watch" over time itself. The estructura portante in this context is not only the physical foundation but also the spiritual framework: a call to vigilance, an enduring emblem of faith in the midst of the wild, unpredictable jungle of life.

Patriarchal Effort and Spiritual Praxis: There's something striking about interpreting this legacy as a patriarchal effort—where the architects and artisans channel a legacy of determination, faith, and purpose. Their commitment to erecting these monumental structures parallels the call to "watch and pray," urging future generations to adopt a similar posture of reflective action supported by the solid knowledge of God.

 

Bridging the Two Worlds

The Maya's estructura portante embodies both a literal and symbolic groundwork. It speaks of an enduring persistence—a message that the stability of our lives, like the stelae rising from the Guatemalan jungles, depends on a firm, unyielding base. It's an architectural and metaphysical declaration: that in order to face life’s relentless challenges, we must build upon, and remain vigilant upon, the rock-solid knowledge and timeless guidance available to us.

This deeper dive into the estructura portante reveals how artifacts of stone can narrate stories of human striving, endurance, and the constant call to remain ever watchful and prayerful. Does this resonate with your understanding of the Maya legacy and the wisdom hidden in their enduring creations?

STEPHENS, John Lloyd

John Lloyd Stephens
Maya Stele
Copán
Acero de Toledo
Extremadura
La Tizona

Psalms 1:1
“Blessed is the man that walketh not in the counsel of the ungodly, nor standeth in the way of sinners, nor sitteth in the seat of the scornful.”

 

 

El éxito de España en la Conquista de México no se habría dado si el sustrato "Azteca" no hubiese estado fervientemente ARMADO en la adoración de Huitzilopochtli. Lo adoraban, y la Élite Azteca vio y supo que su Hitzilopochtli, y no Quetzalcoatl, venía encarnado humana y culturalmente en EL CONQUISTADOR ESPAÑOL!

El cuchillo utilizado en los sacrificios humanos era llamado técpatl y se le atribuía vida propia. Además, técpatl era el signo decimoctavo del tonalpohualli, uno de los cuatro portadores del año, y se encontraba asociado al rumbo norte del universo. Los mexicas dedicaban el día 1 técpatl a su deidad tutelar Huitzilopochtli y le dedicaban ofrendas, además de poner sus adornos al sol.

Maya stelae (singular stela) are monuments that were fashioned by the Maya civilization of ancient Mesoamerica. They consist of tall, sculpted stone shafts and are often associated with low circular stones referred to as altars, although their actual function is uncertain. Many stelae were sculpted in low relief although plain monuments are found throughout the Maya region. The sculpting of these monuments spread throughout the Maya area during the Classic Period (250–900 AD),^[ and these pairings of sculpted stelae and circular altars are considered a hallmark of Classic Maya civilization. The earliest dated stela to have been found in situ in the Maya lowlands was recovered from the great city of Tikal in Guatemala. During the Classic Period almost every Maya kingdom in the southern lowlands raised stelae in its ceremonial centre

Chess: "John Lloyd Stephens" "Estela Maya" "Copán" "Toledo" "Extremadura" "La Tizona"

John Lloyd Stephens

John Lloyd Stephens
Lawrence
St. Lawrence
Arabia
Herradura Cove
Playa Potrero
Prov.4:26
"Ponder the path of thy feet, and let all thy ways be established."

“Our Meistersinger, thou set breath in steel;

And it was thou who on the boldest heel
Stood up and flung the span on even wing
Of that great Bridge, our Myth, wherof I sing!” – Hart Crane: Cape Hatteras

 Zephyr Palace, Herradura, Costa Rica.

 Herradura Cove, Villa Lapas

Marriott Los Sueños

Playa Herradura, Garabito, Jacó, Puntarenas

Engadin Valley, Swiss Alps, Switzerland

 Aerial View of Boldt Castle on Heart Island, St. Lawrence River

Thousand Islands - Río San Lorenzo. EEUU Y CANADÁ

 King Street E. looking West towards St. Lawrence Market, Toronto

 John Lloyd Stephens and Frederick Catherwood: Pioneers of Mayan Archaeology 

by Peter O. Koch

Brooklyn Bridge

Chess:  "John Lloyd Stephens" "Lawrence" "St. Lawrence" "Arabia" "Herradura Cove" "Playa Potrero"

The Collected Poems of Hart Crane

On "Ave Maria"

---

Edward Brunner

The dramatic monologue of "Ave Maria" opens with Columbus crowing like a braggart, congratulating himself on his own superiority. Though he is in the midst of a pounding storm, his concentration is turned toward the accolades he expects at his triumphant return to Spain. He is eager to sweep into the king’s court and rout all those experts and critics who had scorned him, and he invokes his two staunchest advocates: "Be with me, Luis de San Angel, now—"

For I have seen now what no perjured breath
Of clown nor sage can riddle or gainsay;—
To you, too, Juan Perez, whose counsel fear
And greed adjourned,—I bring you back Cathay!

The note of defiance here is unmistakable, but it masks a profound misunderstanding: Columbus’s error, as he will realize in the course of his monologue, is that be believes that "Cathay" is his to bring "back." As long as he is convinced that he possesses Cathay, then he will be truly lost, assailed by a fierce storm that is a parallel to the tempest within him. In truth, his vindictive boasting and his determination to clutch Cathay is a form of greed that should be more alarming to him than death by water. In the beginning, however, the storm he is enduring only prods him into greater boastfulness; he does not yet know that the storm outside and the storm inside are one and the same thing.
To convince himself of the rightness of his mission and to assuage the fear that he may lose all in his storm, he clings to a vision that assigns him a central role of the highest importance. There is a desperate shrillness in his assertions, swathed as they in an unmistakable pride: "I thought of Genoa; and this truth, now proved, / That made me exile in her streets, stood me / More absolute than ever." The emphasis is on the fatal flaw of an unyielding pride. If his truth has been vindicated, then why is he subject to this "tempest-lash"? This is the question that gnaws at him throughout the storm and leads him to rehearse his moments of triumph, both those of the past in the discovery of Cathay and those to come in the future in his return to the court. To steady himself he relives again his moment of glory, the instant when the natives, seeing his boats and men for the first time, addressed them as gods: "And they came out to us crying, / ‘The Great White Birds!’"
With this memory, Columbus is suddenly abashed; he turns at once to address "Madre Maria," as though he had indeed stepped over the marl. He hears the boastful note in his own voice. And from his own shock of realizing that he had been thinking of himself as a god, he understands that his own word has been tested and found wanting. He is, in reality, "between two worlds" where another, harsh, // This third of water, tests the word." The awed praise he had received from the natives had been exactly what he had been anticipating from those contemptible "clowns" and "sages" on his return home, when he could state dramatically and unequivocally: "I bring you back Cathay!"
Cathay is not his to possess. Chastened by the gulf that has opened between his perilous actual position in the waters and his pompous, vainglorious ambition, he experiences the storm dying down (for the storm had been inside him from the start): "Some inmost sob, half-heard, dissuades the abyss, / Merges the wind in measure to the waves, // Series on series, infinite." To Columbus, the amerlioration of the tempest appears as divine intervention; to the modern reader, it is the new confession of humility, that "inmost sob, half-heard," that calms the waters. The abrupt shift in Colkumbus’s fortunes originates in his ability to take the measure of his own vanity, to recoil from it, then rise above it. The reason, then, that his prophecy suddenly seems to carry such undeniable authority—

                                    this crescent ring
Sun-cusped and zoned with modulated fire
Like pearls that whisper through the Doge’s hands
—Yet no delirium of jewels! O Fernando,
Take of that eastern shore, this western sea,
Yet yield thy God’s, thy Virgin’s charity!
—Rush down the plenitude and you shall see
Isaiah counting famine on this lee!

—is that we sense it is his own previous greed and possessiveness and ambition, not simply Fernando’s, that he is pushing away from in these climactic lines. The passage is not simply a condemnation of Fernando but a condemnation of what he himself had become. …
The end result of Columbus’s increased self-awareness is a total sense of the dynamic harmony of the universe, a universe in which he plays a small but crucial part. The concluding stanzas, which to him appear as a vision of the presence of Elohim, to the modern reader appear as a reflection of his new magnanimity. His own assertive ego has been set aside, and he relives with a new understanding his passage westward; it is a test in which God "Cruelly with love" sounds the "parable of man." Like Job he is beset by trials, but he can rise above them by his refusal to yield to pride or ambition. The parable of man is that he has the freedom to fall or, if he takes the courage to face himself, the freedom to soar. The endlessness of such testing is only to be welcomed, for to be challenged, to be brought up short, is to be made aware of one’s own frailty and falsity, and to be given the opportunity to rise to even grater heights. Though the poem ends with no land in sight but "still one shore beyond desire," the conclusion is an affirmative cry. The testing "Hand of Fire" offers the hope of a joyful self-renewal.

From Edward Brunner, "The Bridge in 1926 (I)," Chapter 8 in Splendid Failure: Hart Crane and the Making of "The Bridge" (Urbana: U Illinois P, 1985), 135-138

---

Lee Edelman

"Ave Maria" reinterprets Whitman’s "Passage to India" and "Prayer of Columbus"; but it is Whitman himself whose presence Crane acknowledges in his address to the power that sleeps upon itself [lines 57-58: "O Thou who sleepest on Thyself, apart / Like ocean athwart lanes of death and birth"]. For the rhetoric of Crane’s prayer invokes the language with which Whitman, in "Passage to India," appropriates the authority of deity to himself:

O Thou transcendent,
Nameless, the fibre and the breath,
Light of the light, shedding forth universes, thou centre of them,
Thou pulse – thou motive of the stars, suns, systems,
That, circling, move in order, safe. Harmonious,
Athwart the shapeless vastnesses of space,
How should I think, how breathe a single breath, how speak if, out of myself,
I could not launch. To those, superior universes? (lines 193-95, 201-5)

Crane’s recasting of these lines in "Ave Maria" appeals to a "transcendent" deity only on the level of narrative myth; in a deeper sense, as I will argue, Crane’s prayer is addressed to Whitman himself. And embedded further in the subtext of that prayer lies, as [R. W. B.] Lewis has also noted, an allusion to these lines from Keats’s "Sleep and Poetry" … Just as Keats declares poetry "the supreme of power," so Whitman, who begins by acclaiming the creative abilities of a "nameless" and "transcendent" presence, ends by internalizing the power of that entity, claiming it as his own.
This claim provides the basis for Crane’s audacious apostrophe to a Whitman cunningly elevated to the status of a deity. That implicit apotheosis of Whitman can be clarified by referring to a passage in "Cape Hatteras" where Crane, with a modesty that belies the will to power of his text, ascribes to Whitman the construction of the very bridge that Crane figures as the source of poetic energy itself:

Our Meistersinger, thou set breath in steel;
And it was thou who on the boldest heel
Stood up and flung the span on even wing
Of that great Bridge, our Myth, whereof I sing!

These lines echo the language and imagery of Columbus’s prayer in "Ave Maria" in the same way that the prayer alludes to Whitman’s phraseology in "Passage to India." The verbal parallels between these two passages from Crane’s poem point to the conflation of Whitman with the deity addressed in "Ave Maria."…
Yet if he conflates Whitman with the deity addressed by Columbus, Crane subsequently attempts to internalize Whitman just as Whitman internalized the "transcendent" power that his own poem addressed. … Where Whitman multiplies himself to undertake this dangerous voyage, Crane insists on isolation: "Utter to loneliness the sail is true." This solitude or "loneliness: achieves for the poet a freedom from the companion whose presence he would deny by successfully internalizing. Indeed, this "utter loneliness" signifies the loneliness of utterance he desires, the solitary eminance he would attain as he sails toward the "incognizable Word" that "Atlantis" will reformulate in a catachresis that designates the bridge itself as "steeled Cognizance."

From Lee Edelman, Transmemberment of Song: Hart Crane’s Anatomies of Rhetoric and Desire (Stanford: Stanford U P, 1987), 202-203.

---