Saturday, June 6, 2026

Henry Fielding

Henry Fielding
Manet
Fig 


Romans 5:1
“Therefore being justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ:” 




"None of them .. would have cared a fig the more for me"~~~Hawthorne
 
 

 


A Bar at the Folies-Bergère  


A Bar at the Folies-Bergère (French: Un bar aux Folies Bergère) is a painting by Édouard Manet, considered to be his last major work. It was painted in 1882 and exhibited at the Paris Salon of that year. It depicts a scene in the Folies Bergère nightclub in Paris. The painting originally belonged to the composer Emmanuel Chabrier, a close friend of Manet, and hung over his piano. It is now in the Courtauld Gallery in London.  

The painting exemplifies Manet's commitment to realism in its detailed representation of a contemporary scene. Many features have puzzled critics but almost all of them have been shown to have a rationale, and the painting has been the subject of numerous popular and scholarly articles. 

The central figure stands before a mirror, although critics—accusing Manet of ignorance of perspective and alleging various impossibilities in the painting—have debated this point since the earliest reviews were published. In 2000, however, art historian Malcolm Park proved the perspective was physically possible by staging a reconstruction shown to reproduce the scene as painted by Manet. According to this reconstruction, "the conversation that many have assumed was transpiring between the barmaid and gentleman is revealed to be an optical trick—the man stands outside the painter's field of vision, to the left, and looks away from the barmaid, rather than standing right in front of her." As it appears, the observer should be standing to the right and closer to the bar than the man whose reflection appears at the right edge of the picture. This is an unusual departure from the central point of view usually assumed when viewing pictures drawn according to perspective. 

Asserting the presence of the mirror has been crucial for many modern interpreters. It provides a meaningful parallel with Las Meninas, a masterpiece by an artist Manet admired, Diego Velázquez. There has been a considerable development of this topic since Michel Foucault broached it in his book The Order of Things (1966). 
The art historian Jeffrey Meyers describes the intentional play on perspective and the apparent violation of the operations of mirrors: "Behind her, and extending for the entire length of the four-and-a-quarter-foot painting, is the gold frame of an enormous mirror. The French philosopher Maurice Merleau-Ponty has called a mirror 'the instrument of a universal magic that changes things into spectacles, spectacles into things, me into others, and others into me.' We, the viewers, stand opposite the barmaid on the other side of the counter and, looking at the reflection in the mirror, see exactly what she sees... A critic has noted that Manet's 'preliminary study shows her placed off to the right, whereas in the finished canvas she is very much the centre of attention.' Though Manet shifted her from the right to the center, he kept her reflection on the right. Seen in the mirror, she seems engaged with a customer; in full face, she's self-protectively withdrawn and remote." 

The painting is rich in details which provide clues to social class and milieu. The woman at the bar is a real person, known as Suzon, who worked at the Folies-Bergère in the early 1880s. For his painting, Manet posed her in his studio. By including a dish of oranges in the foreground, Manet identifies the barmaid as a prostitute, according to art historian Larry L. Ligo, who says that Manet habitually associated oranges with prostitution in his paintings. T. J. Clark says that the barmaid is "intended to represent one of the prostitutes for which the Folies-Bergère was well-known", who is represented "as both a salesperson and a commodity—something to be purchased along with a drink."

Other notable details include the pair of green feet in the upper left-hand corner, which belong to a trapeze artist who is performing above the restaurant's patrons. The beer bottles depicted are easily identified by the red triangle on the label as Bass Pale Ale, and the conspicuous presence of this British brand instead of German beer has been interpreted as documentation of anti-German sentiment in France in the decade after the Franco-Prussian War.

Friday, June 5, 2026

Georgia

 𝐏𝐄𝐀𝐍𝐔𝐓𝐒; 𝐎𝐑 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐍𝐔𝐄𝐂𝐄𝐒 𝐒𝐓𝐑𝐈𝐏 
 

"𝑊ℎ𝑒𝑛 𝐹𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑙𝑙𝑒𝑑 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑀𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑝𝑝𝑖, 𝑆𝑝𝑎𝑖𝑛 ℎ𝑎𝑑 𝑏𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑎𝑔𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑏𝑜𝑟𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝑏𝑒𝑡𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑆𝑝𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑠ℎ 𝑇𝑒𝑗𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝐹𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑐ℎ 𝐿𝑜𝑢𝑖𝑠𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑎, 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑎𝑓𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑀𝑒𝑥𝑖𝑐𝑜 𝑤𝑜𝑛 ℎ𝑒𝑟 𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑒𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑠ℎ𝑒, 𝑡𝑜𝑜, 𝑘𝑒𝑝𝑡 𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑢𝑙 𝑤𝑎𝑡𝑐ℎ 𝑎𝑙𝑜𝑛𝑔 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑏𝑜𝑟𝑑𝑒𝑟. 𝐵𝑢𝑡 𝑛𝑒𝑖𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟 𝑆𝑝𝑎𝑖𝑛 𝑛𝑜𝑟 𝑀𝑒𝑥𝑖𝑐𝑜 𝑐𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑑 𝑚𝑢𝑐ℎ 𝑤ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑏𝑜𝑟𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝑏𝑒𝑡𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑇𝑒𝑗𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑖𝑡𝑠 𝑛𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑏𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑡𝑠 𝑡𝑜 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑜𝑢𝑡ℎ 𝑤𝑎𝑠; 𝑖𝑡 𝑤𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑒𝑑 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑠 𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑑𝑒𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑟𝑎𝑛 𝑎𝑙𝑜𝑛𝑔 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑀𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑎 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑁𝑢𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑠 𝑟𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑠. 𝑆𝑜 𝑤ℎ𝑒𝑛 𝑇𝑒𝑗𝑎𝑠 𝑏𝑟𝑜𝑘𝑒 𝑎𝑤𝑎𝑦 𝑖𝑛 1836, 𝑜𝑓𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙𝑠 𝑖𝑛 𝑀𝑒𝑥𝑖𝑐𝑜 ℎ𝑜𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑙𝑦 𝑏𝑒𝑙𝑖𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑑 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑠𝑒 𝑟𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑠 𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑙𝑙 𝑚𝑎𝑟𝑘𝑒𝑑 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑏𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑟𝑦 𝑏𝑒𝑡𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑛𝑒𝑤 𝑇𝑒𝑥𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑜𝑙𝑑 𝐶𝑜𝑎ℎ𝑢𝑖𝑙𝑎 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑇𝑎𝑚𝑎𝑢𝑙𝑖𝑝𝑎𝑠, 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒕𝒉𝒂𝒕 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒊𝒏𝒇𝒂𝒎𝒐𝒖𝒔 𝑵𝒖𝒆𝒄𝒆𝒔 𝑺𝒕𝒓𝒊𝒑 𝒘𝒂𝒔 𝑴𝒆𝒙𝒊𝒄𝒂𝒏. 𝐵𝑢𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑛𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑜𝑓 𝑇𝑒𝑥𝑎𝑠, 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑛𝑜𝑤 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑈𝑛𝑖𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑆𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑠, ℎ𝑎𝑑 𝑎𝑙𝑤𝑎𝑦𝑠 𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑢𝑒𝑑 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑏𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑎𝑟𝑦 𝑙𝑎𝑦 𝑠𝑜𝑢𝑡ℎ 𝑎𝑡 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑅𝑖𝑜 𝐺𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑒, 𝑏𝑢𝑡 𝑛𝑒𝑖𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟 ℎ𝑎𝑑 𝑚𝑢𝑐ℎ 𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑖𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒 𝑑𝑜𝑐𝑢𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑡𝑜 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑠. 𝑁𝑜𝑤, 𝑖𝑛 1845, 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑁𝑢𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑠 𝑆𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑝 𝑤𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑠 𝑚𝑢𝑐ℎ 𝑎𝑛 𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑎 𝑜𝑓 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑎𝑠 𝑖𝑡 ℎ𝑎𝑑 𝑎𝑙𝑤𝑎𝑦𝑠 𝑏𝑒𝑒𝑛."~~~James A. Michener: TEXAS. Ch.8 The Ranger. 
 
 

 
𝐌𝐚𝐭𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐰 𝟏𝟏:𝟐𝟗
“𝐓𝐚𝐤𝐞 𝐦𝐲 𝐲𝐨𝐤𝐞 𝐮𝐩𝐨𝐧 𝐲𝐨𝐮, 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐥𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐧 𝐨𝐟 𝐦𝐞; 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐈 𝐚𝐦 𝐦𝐞𝐞𝐤 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐥𝐨𝐰𝐥𝐲 𝐢𝐧 𝐡𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐭: 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐲𝐞 𝐬𝐡𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐟𝐢𝐧𝐝 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐭 𝐮𝐧𝐭𝐨 𝐲𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐬𝐨𝐮𝐥𝐬.” 


Acts 16:31
“And they said, Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house.”


⭐ What the passage is really saying (broken down clearly)
1. Spain vs. France: the original anxiety
When France controlled Louisiana (before 1803), Spain worried about French encroachment into Tejas.
But Spain did not worry about the internal border between:

Tejas

Coahuila

Tamaulipas

Those were all Spanish provinces, so the exact line didn’t matter.

2. After Mexican independence (1821)
Mexico inherited Spain’s view:
The internal border between Tejas and the provinces to the south was vague and unimportant.

The assumed line was:

Medina River

Nueces River

This was the traditional, informal understanding.

3. When Texas became independent (1836)
Mexico believed — sincerely — that the old internal provincial boundary still applied:

Texas ends at the Nueces.
Everything between the Nueces and the Rio Grande is still Mexico.

This region is what later became famous as the Nueces Strip. 

4. But Texas (and later the U.S.) claimed something very different
Texas insisted that its southern boundary was:

the Rio Grande,
not the Nueces.

This claim was based on:

the Treaties of Velasco (1836), which Mexico never recognized

Texan political necessity

weak or ambiguous documentation

So the U.S. inherited a disputed claim, not a settled border.

5. By 1845 (annexation of Texas)
The Nueces Strip was:

claimed by Mexico

claimed by Texas and the U.S.

inhabited by Tejanos, ranchers, and Comanches

patrolled by both armies

a zone of constant tension

This is the strip where:

Zachary Taylor marched U.S. troops

Mexico saw this as an invasion

The Thornton Affair occurred

The U.S. declared war

In other words:

The war began because the two nations disagreed on whether the border was the Nueces or the Rio Grande.

⭐ Why this matters historically
This single ambiguity — a leftover from Spanish administrative laziness — became:

a diplomatic crisis

a military flashpoint

the legal justification for war

the origin of the modern Texas–Mexico border

It’s one of those moments where a forgotten line on an old map becomes destiny. 
XX 

Jorge — this is one of those topics where history and myth sit on the same tectonic line.  
A border is never just a border. It is a scar, a threshold, a mythic seam where two worlds grind against each other. The Texas–Mexico border — especially the Nueces–Rio Grande ambiguity — is one of the clearest symbolic cases in the Americas.

Let me give you a symbolic reading that honors the history without touching stereotypes or group essentialism. This is about structures, not peoples.

⭐ A Symbolic Reading of the Texas–Mexico Border
(The Nueces Strip as a Mythic Zone)

🌊 1. Two Rivers = Two Stories of Origin
The dispute is literally a conflict between two rivers, and rivers in myth always represent:

identity

memory

the boundary between worlds

The Nueces is the older, quieter, administrative river — the one inherited from Spain and assumed by Mexico.
The Rio Grande is the younger, more forceful, myth‑making river — the one claimed by Texas and later the U.S.

Symbolically:

Nueces = the remembered past

Rio Grande = the desired future

The conflict is a clash between inheritance and aspiration.

⚡ 2. The Nueces Strip = The Liminal Zone
The land between the two rivers — the Nueces Strip — is a classic mythic space:

a no‑man’s‑land

a threshold

a contested dreamscape

a place where identity is unstable

In myth, this is the borderland where heroes are tested, where law is ambiguous, where the old order and the new order overlap like two shadows.

It is the “in‑between” — neither fully one thing nor the other.

🗡️ 3. Spain’s indifference = the forgotten line
Spain never cared about the internal boundary because it was all one empire.
Symbolically, this is the original sin of ambiguity:

A line not drawn becomes a line fought over.

In myth, when a boundary is left undefined, it becomes a fault line that later generations must confront.

🔥 4. Texas Independence = the rupture of the old cosmology
When Texas breaks away in 1836, the symbolic structure shifts:

Mexico sees the old internal line (Nueces).

Texas sees the new external line (Rio Grande).

This is a classic mythic pattern:

The child claims a new identity;
the parent insists on the old map.

It is Jacob wrestling the angel,
Romulus drawing the furrow,
the Hero Twins redrawing the underworld’s rules.

🧭 5. The U.S. annexation (1845) = the moment the myth hardens into geopolitics
When the U.S. adopts Texas’s claim, the symbolic tension becomes a state‑to‑state confrontation.

The border becomes:

a line of projection

a line of fear

a line of destiny

a line of misunderstanding

In mythic terms, this is when the threshold becomes a battleground.

🌑 6. The deeper symbolic structure
The Texas–Mexico border dispute is not just about land.
It is about two cosmologies trying to define:

where one world ends

and another begins

Symbolically:

Mexico is defending the memory of the old administrative order (Nueces).

Texas/U.S. is asserting a new political identity (Rio Grande).

Neither is “right” in symbolic terms — they are two mythic logics colliding.

⭐ The Core Symbolic Insight
The Texas–Mexico border is the place where two historical imaginations meet, overlap, and refuse to align.

The Nueces Strip is the mythic seam where the past and the future argue over who gets to draw the map.

Wednesday, June 3, 2026

SIXTY

To England and Avalon ! 💖⚽

⭐ Sixty Suns Later
A Reflective Essay






There are moments when history feels less like a sequence of events and more like a circle turning, a cosmic wheel completing its revolution. The number 60 has always carried that weight — the sexagesimal heartbeat of ancient timekeepers, the measure of completeness in Sumerian mathematics, the rhythm by which the heavens themselves were once counted. Sixty is not just a number; it is a return, a closure, a renewal.

And so, as sixty suns of years pass between 1966 and 2026, the mind begins to sense a pattern — not a prediction, but a mythic symmetry. England’s lone coronation in the world’s great juego de pelota, the World Cup, stands like a solitary monument in the national memory. If the Lion were to rise again after sixty years, it would feel less like coincidence and more like the completion of a cosmic arc.

But this cycle of descent and ascent is older than football.
It is older than nations.
It is the grammar of myth itself.

In Giotto’s frescoes, the story unfolds in stone‑like color: Christ descends into the weight of human suffering, collapses into death, and then rises in a blaze of upward movement. Giotto paints gravity as theology — the downward diagonal of incarnation, the upward diagonal of resurrection. His art is a visual axis mundi, a ladder between worlds.

Across the ocean, in the jungles of Tikal, the Maya carved the same truth into limestone. Their pyramids are mountains of ascent, stairways of light, stages for the eternal drama of descent into Xibalba and return to the sky. The Hero Twins enact the pattern: trials, death, reconstitution, victory, and celestial enthronement. Their story is not Christian, yet it rhymes with Christianity — because both speak the language of the cosmos.

And at the Jordan River, in the Gospel narrative, the pattern crystallizes in a single moment. Christ descends into the waters — the symbolic underworld — and rises as the heavens open. A voice declares:

“This is my beloved Son.”

It is the Regal Statement, the divine coronation, the proclamation that the journey through death will end in glory. Romans 10:9 gives the ritual echo of that ascent: confess, believe, rise. The same architecture appears again and again: descent → trial → death → vindication → ascent → glory.

Giotto paints it.
Tikal builds it.
The Hero Twins enact it.
The Gospel proclaims it.

And now, in a playful yet strangely resonant way, football hints at it.
The ball rolls like the sun across the heavens.
The stadium becomes a modern coliseum of myth.
And sixty years — the ancient number of cosmic completion — whisper through the turning of the world.

If England were to rise again in 2026, it would not merely be a sporting victory.
It would feel like a return, a renewal, a mythic echo of 1966 —
a Lion awakening after sixty suns.

Not prophecy.
Not prediction.
Just the poetry of time.

A circle closing.
A story ascending.
A nation listening for its own Regal Statement.

Tuesday, June 2, 2026

Thomas Mann

Thomas Mann
Belle 
Bell 
 
𝐉𝐨𝐛 𝟏𝟗:𝟐𝟓
“𝐅𝐨𝐫 𝐈 𝐤𝐧𝐨𝐰 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐦𝐲 𝐫𝐞𝐝𝐞𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐫 𝐥𝐢𝐯𝐞𝐭𝐡, 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐡𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐚𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐥𝐚𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐝𝐚𝐲 𝐮𝐩𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐡:”
 
 
 
 
Candice Swanepoel
 
 
 

 
Chess: "Thomas Mann" "Belle" "Bell" 
 

𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐏𝐘𝐑𝐀𝐌𝐈𝐃 𝐎𝐅 𝐌𝐀𝐉𝐄𝐒𝐓𝐘:

The mountain’s form is a perfect pyramid, its slopes adorned with glaciers that glisten like diamonds in the sun.
As you gaze upward, the snowfield seems to stretch infinitely, merging seamlessly with the azure sky.
The Grossglockner stands as a testament to the timeless power of nature, its ancient rocks whispering tales of eons gone by.

The name actually consists of two components:
“Gross”: This means “big” in German.
“Glockner”: The exact origin of this word is intriguing.
Some scholars believe it might be related to the German word “Glocke”, which means “bell”.
This association could be due to the mountain’s characteristic shape, resembling a bell.
Alternatively, it could be a Germanized version of the Alpine Slavic word “Klek”, which translates to “mountain”.
In fact, the Slovene name for Grossglockner is “Veliki Klek”, where “Veliki” means “big”. 

Sunday, May 31, 2026

LEONARDO'S

𝐋𝐄𝐎𝐍𝐀𝐑𝐃𝐎'𝐒
Edward III
The North

Proverbs 28:1
“The wicked flee when no man pursueth: but the righteous are bold as a lion.”  
 
 
 

 
 
 "Giotto's other great works were also painted for bankers, the two chief financial families in Florence, the Bardi and the Peruzzi. These hard-headed men were later to make a disastrous mistake: they failed to recognise the gulf that separated their bourgeois economy from the irresponsible aristocracy of the north, and lent millions of pounds to King Edward III to carry on his war against France. In 1339 he calmly defaulted — what were money lenders to the father of the Black Prince? The result was one of the first classic crashes in the history of capitalism."~~~Kenneth Clark: CIVILISATION. Ch. 3 Romance and Reality.
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
Chess: "Leonardo's" ""Edward III" "The North" 

Friday, May 29, 2026

Commitment

Commitment 
Hatillo 

μὴ φοβοῦ, τὸ μικρὸν ποίμνιον
mē phobou, to mikron poimnion
No temáis, pequeño rebaño.  

 
 
Luke 12:32
“Fear not, little flock; for it is your Father's good pleasure to give you the kingdom.”

 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
Chess: "Commitment" "Hatillo" 

Art

Art 
Arthurian 
Arthesian Well 
Artemis 
Jack 
 

Proverbs 12:24
“The hand of the diligent shall bear rule: but the slothful shall be under tribute.”
 
 

 
“Of Arthur, who, to, upper light restored,
With that terrific sword,
Which yet he brandishes for future war,
Shall lift his country’s fame above the polar star? ~~~
Wordsworth

We must be the great arsenal of democracy”~~~F.D. Roosevelt

“Throngs of knights and barons bold,
In weeds of peace high triumphs hold,
With store of ladies, whose bright eyes
Rain influence and judge the prize.”~~~
MILTON


 
 
Chess:  “Art” “Arthurian” “Artesian Well” “Artemis” "Jack"

Thursday, May 28, 2026

Butter

Butter 
Better 
Business




Deuteronomy 6:5
“And thou shalt love the LORD thy God with all thine heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy might.” 

"The business of America is business."~~~Calvin Coolidge

𝐁𝐮𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐠𝐚𝐥𝐨𝐫𝐞! 
𝐁𝐫𝐨𝐨𝐤 𝐁𝐞𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐇𝐚𝐥𝐟 𝐒𝐡𝐢𝐞𝐥𝐝𝐬 


 
 
 
 
 
Mound of Butter is a still life painting of a mound of butter, by the 19th-century French realist painter Antoine Vollon made between 1875 and 1885. The painting is in the National Gallery of Art in Washington, D.C., with The New York Times calling it one of "Washington’s Crown Jewels"
 
 

 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Chess: "Butter" "Better" "Business" 

Tuesday, May 26, 2026

HOPLITE (HAWKEYE)

 HOPLITE (HAWKEYE) 



 1 John 1:9
“If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.”


Joshua 8:28
“And Joshua burnt Ai, and made it an heap for ever, even a desolation unto this day.” 

 

 

 "Didst thou not agree with me for a penny?" ~~~Matthew 20:13

𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐝𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐮𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐨𝐟 𝐀𝐢 𝐬𝐲𝐦𝐛𝐨𝐥𝐢𝐳𝐞𝐬:
𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐩𝐮𝐫𝐠𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐨𝐟 𝐜𝐨𝐫𝐫𝐮𝐩𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧,
𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐨𝐟 𝐝𝐢𝐯𝐢𝐧𝐞 𝐟𝐚𝐯𝐨𝐫,
𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐞𝐰𝐚𝐥 𝐨𝐟 𝐈𝐬𝐫𝐚𝐞𝐥’𝐬 𝐦𝐢𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧.
𝐀𝐢’𝐬 𝐫𝐮𝐢𝐧 𝐛𝐞𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐬 𝐚 𝐦𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝐨𝐟 𝐣𝐮𝐝𝐠𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 — 𝐚 𝐰𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐚𝐠𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐬𝐭 𝐝𝐢𝐬𝐨𝐛𝐞𝐝𝐢𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞. 

 

Hoplite (Hawkeye)

 

 

THE CONQUEST OF AI

The Conquest of Ai
Hoplite
Hawkeye 
La Conquista 
Five Star General 
Harold 
Howard
Congress 
Ring  
 
1 John 1:9
“If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.” 
 
Joshua 8:28
“And Joshua burnt Ai, and made it an heap for ever, even a desolation unto this day.” 
 
 
 
"Didst thou not agree with me for a penny?" 
 
The destruction of Ai symbolizes:

the purging of corruption,
the restoration of divine favor,
the renewal of Israel’s mission.

Ai’s ruin becomes a memorial of judgment — a warning against disobedience.
 
 
 
 
 

 
 the beauty of the hawk’s eye…full, liquid, and piercing.”~~~Richard Jefferies
 
 

 
 Ai

 
 
 
Chess: "Five Star General" "Harold" "Congress" "Ring" "The Conquest of Ai" "Howard" "La Conquista" "Hoplite" "Hawkeye"