Showing posts with label eye of the tiger. Show all posts
Showing posts with label eye of the tiger. Show all posts

Monday, June 13, 2016

Eye of the Tiger

Eye of the Tiger
La Negrita
Army
Old Mecca
"Ya que la hizo negra, hágala trompuda."

Prov.16:23
"The heart of the wise teacheth his mouth, and addeth learning to his lips."











Old Mecca







ARMY: La Negrita






















































Chess: "Eye of the Tiger" "La Negrita" "Old Mecca" "Ya que la hizo negra hágala trompuda." "Army"




 Ragnarök 
Jorge Luis Borges : El Hacedor


En los sueños (escribe Coleridge) las imágenes figuran las impresiones que pensamos que causan; no sentimos horror porque nos oprime una esfinge, soñamos una esfinge para explicar el horror que sentimos. Si esto es así, ¿cómo podría una mera crónica de sus formas transmitir el estupor, la exaltación, las alarmas, la amenaza y el júbilo que tejieron el sueño de esa noche? Ensayaré esa crónica, sin embargo; acaso el hecho de que una sola escena integró aquel sueño borre o mitigue la dificultad esencial. El lugar era la Facultad de Filosofía y Letras; la hora, el atardecer. Todo (como suele ocurrir en los sueños) era un poco distinto; una ligera magnificación alteraba las cosas. Elegíamos autoridades; yo hablaba con Pedro Henríquez Ureña, que en la vigilia ha muerto hace muchos años. Bruscamente nos aturdió un clamor de manifestación o de murga. Alaridos humanos y animales llegaban desde el Bajo. Una voz gritó: "¡Ahí vienen!" y después "¡Los Dioses! ¡Los Dioses!" Cuatro o cinco sujetos salieron de la turba y ocuparon la tarima del Aula Magna. Todos aplaudimos, llorando; eran los Dioses que volvían al cabo de un destierro de siglos. Agrandados por la tarima, la cabeza echada hacia atrás y el pecho hacia adelante, recibieron con soberbia nuestro homenaje. Uno sostenía una rama, que se conformaba, sin duda, a la sencilla botánica de los sueños; otro, en amplio ademán, extendía una mano que era una garra; una de las caras de Jano miraba con recelo el encorvado pico de Thoth. Tal vez excitado por nuestros aplausos, uno, ya no sé cuál, prorrumpió en un cloqueo victorioso, increíblemente agrio, con algo de gárgara y de silbido. Las cosas, desde aquel momento, cambiaron. Todo empezó por la sospecha (tal vez exagerada) de que los Dioses no sabían hablar. Siglos de vida fugitiva y feral habían atrofiado en ellos lo humano; la luna del Islam y la cruz de Roma habían sido implacables con esos prófugos. Frentes muy bajas, dentaduras amarillas, bigotes ralos de mulato o de chino y belfos bestiales publicaban la degeneración de la estirpe olímpica. Sus prendas no correspondían a una pobreza decorosa y decente sino al lujo malevo de los garitos y de los lupanares del Bajo. En un ojal sangraba un clavel; en un saco ajustado se adivinaba el bulto de una daga. Bruscamente sentimos que jugaban su última carta, que eran taimados, ignorantes y crueles como viejos animales de presa y que, si nos dejábamos ganar por el miedo o la lástima, acabarían por destruirnos. Sacamos los pesados revólveres (de pronto hubo revólveres en el sueño) y alegremente dimos muerte a los Dioses.







Ragnarök :: J. L. Borges


In our dreams (writes Coleridge) images represent the sensations we think they cause; we do not feel horror because we are threatened by a sphinx ; we dream a sphinx in order to explain the horror we feel. If this is so, how could a mere chronicle of its forms transmit the stupor, the exaltation, the alarm, the menace and the jubilance which made up the fabric of that dream that night? I shall attempt such a chronicle, however; perhaps the fact that the dream was composed of one single scene may remove or mitigate this essential difficulty.
The place was the School of Philosophy and Letters; the time, toward sundown. Everything (as usually happens in dreams) was somehow different; a slight magnification altered things. We were electing officials: I was talking with Pedro Henríquez Ureña, who in the world of waking reality died many years ago. Suddenly we were stunned by the clamor of a demonstration or disturbance. Human and animal cries came from the Bajo. A voice shouted “Here they come!” and then “The Gods! The Gods!” Four or five individuals emerged from the mob and occupied the platform of the main lecture hall. We all applauded, tearfully; these were the Gods returning from a centuries-long exile. Made larger by the platform, their heads thrown back and their chests thrust forward, they arrogantly received our homage. One held a branch which no doubt conformed to the simple botany of dreams; another, in a broad gesture, extended his hand which was a claw; one of the faces of Janus looked with distrust at the curved beak of Thoth. Perhaps aroused by our applause, one of them — I know longer know which — erupted in a victorious clatter, unbelievably harsh, with something of a gargle and of a whistle. From that moment, things changed.
It all began with the suspicion (perhaps exaggerated) that the Gods did not know how to talk. Centuries of fell and fugitive life had atrophied the human element in them; the moon of Islam and the cross of Rome had been implacable with these outlaws. Very low foreheads, yellow teeth, stringy mulatto or Chinese mustaches and thick bestial lips showed the degeneracy of the Olympian lineage. Their clothing corresponded not to a decorous poverty but rather to the sinister luxury of the gambling houses and brothels of the Bajo. A carnation bled crimson on a lapel and the bulge of a knife was outlined beneath a close-fitting jacket. Suddenly we sensed that they were playing their last card, that they were cunning, ignorant and cruel like old beasts of prey and that, if we let ourselves be overcome by fear or pity, they would finally destroy us.
We took out our heavy revolvers (all of a sudden there were revolvers in the dream) and joyfully killed the Gods.
Translated by J. E. I.

Wednesday, September 12, 2012

Arte Rupestre

Lascaux
Altamira
"Altamirano"
Eye of the Tiger
Cave Painting 

Psalm 29:7
"The voice of the LORD divideth the flames of fire."

Prov.5:1 
" My son, attend unto my wisdom, and bow thine ear to my understanding:"



















Chess: "Lascaux" "Altamira" "Altamirano" "Cave Painting" "Eye of the Tiger"“Blue Lagoon” “Blue-Bleu” “Llamas” “EA” “easel”

From the Vision of Columbus

By Joel Barlow (1754–1812)

Where Spring's coy steps, in cold Canadia, stray,      
And joyless seasons hold unequal sway,      
He saw the pine its daring mantle rear,                               533.
Break the rude blast and mock the inclement year,      
Secure the limits of the angry skies,      
And bid all southern vegetation rise.      
Wild o'er the vast, impenetrable round,      
The untrod bowers of shadowy nature frown'd;                    538.
The neighbouring cedar waved its honours wide,      
The fir's tall boughs, the oak's resistless pride,      
The branching beach, the aspin's trembling shade,      
Veil'd the dim heavens and brown'd the dusky glade.      
Here in huge crouds those sturdy sons of earth,                   543.
In frosty regions, claim a nobler birth;      
Where heavy trunks the sheltering dome requires,      
And copious fuel feeds the wintery fires.      
While warmer suns, that southern climes emblaze,      
A cool deep umbrage o'er the woodland raise; 548.
Floridia's blooming shores around him spread,      
And Georgian hills erect their shady head;      
Beneath tall trees, in livelier verdure gay,      
Long level walks a humble garb display;      
The infant corn, unconscious of its worth, 553.
Points the green spire and bends the foliage forth;      
Sweeten'd on flowery banks, the passing air      
Breathes all the untasted fragrance of the year;      
Unbidden harvests o'er the regions rise,      
And blooming life repays the genial skies. 558.
Where circling shores around the gulph extend,      
The bounteous groves with richer burdens bend;      
Spontaneous fruits the uplifted palms unfold,      
The beauteous orange waves a load of gold,      
The untaught vine, the wildly-wanton cane 563.
Bloom on the waste, and clothe the enarbour'd plain,      
The rich pimento scents the neighbouring skies,      
And woolly clusters o'er the cotton rise.      
Here, in one view, the same glad branches bring      
The fruits of autumn and the flowers of spring;                       568.
No wintery blasts the unchanging year deform,      
Nor beasts unshelter'd fear the pinching storm;      
But vernal breezes o'er the blossoms rove,      
And breathe the ripen'd juices thro' the grove.      
Beneath the crystal wave's inconstant light, 573.
Pearls undistinguish'd sparkle on the sight;      
From opening earth, in living lustre, shine      
The various treasures of the blazing mine;      
Hills, cleft before him, all their stores unfold,      
The quick mercurius and the burning gold;                        578.
Gems of unnumber'd hues, in bright array,      
Illume the changing rocks and shed the beams of day.      
When now the Chief had travel'd with his eye,      
O'er each fair clime that meets the incumbent sky;     

  Vision of Columbus











Thursday, May 26, 2011

Singer

Singer
Ojo 
Soldier 
Alaska
Trigger
Tiger
Gatillo
Disparador
 
Jas. 1:8
"A double minded man is unstable in all his ways."
 
 Proverbs 21:28
“A false witness shall perish: but the man that heareth speaketh constantly.”
 
 

 
 
 

Elephant Seal Pup, Año Nuevo
A young Elephant Seal Pup takes a break in the sun at Ano Nuevo State Natural Reserve.
Sydney Opera House and Harbor Bridge at Night, Sydney, Australia
Chess: "soldier""Singer" "Alaska" "ojo" "occhi" "cantilever" "eye of the tiger" "Pirates of the Caribbean" "camera" "cámara" "Kilimanjaro" "fugo fish: camarón: shrimp"









The Tiger
By William Blake
Published in 1794 in Songs of Experience

Tiger, tiger, burning bright
In the forests of the night,
What immortal hand or eye
Could frame thy fearful symmetry?


In what distant deeps or skies
Burnt the fire of thine eyes?
On what wings dare he aspire?
What the hand dare seize the fire?


And what shoulder and what art
Could twist the sinews of thy heart?
And, when thy heart began to beat,
What dread hand and what dread feet?


What the hammer? What the chain?
In what furnace was thy brain?
What the anvil? What dread grasp
Dare its deadly terrors clasp?


When the stars threw down their spears,
And water`d heaven with their tears,
Did He smile His work to see?
Did He who made the lamb make thee?


Tiger, tiger, burning bright,
In the forests of the night,
What immortal hand or eye
Dare frame thy fearful symmetry?


Theme
.......“The Tiger,” by William Blake (1757-1827), presents a question that embodies the theme: Who created the tiger? Was it the kind and loving God who made the lamb? Or was it Satan? Blake presents his question in Lines 3 and 4:
    What immortal hand or eye Could frame thy fearful symmetry?
Blake realizes, of course, that God made all the creatures on earth. However, to express his bewilderment that the God who created the gentle lamb also created the terrifying tiger, he includes Satan as a possible creator while raising his rhetorical questions, notably the one he asks in Lines 5 and 6:
    In what distant deeps or skiesBurnt the fire of thy eyes?
Deeps appears to refer to hell and skies to heaven. In either case, there would be fire--the fire of hell or the fire of the stars.
.......Of course, there can be no gainsaying that the tiger symbolizes evil, or the incarnation of evil, and that the lamb (Line 20) represents goodness, or Christ. Blake's inquiry is a variation on an old philosophical and theological question: Why does evil exist in a universe created and ruled by a benevolent God? Blake provides no answer. His mission is to reflect reality in arresting images. A poet’s first purpose, after all, is to present the world and its denizens in language that stimulates the aesthetic sense; he is not to exhort or moralize. Nevertheless, the poem does stir the reader to deep thought. Here is the tiger, fierce and brutal in its quest for sustenance; there is the lamb, meek and gentle in its quest for survival. Is it possible that the same God who made the lamb also made the tiger? Or was the tiger the devil's work?
Meter
The poem is in trochaic tetrameter with catalexis at the end of each line. Here is an explanation of these technical terms:
    Tetrameter Line: a poetry line usually with eight syllables but sometimes seven. Trochaic Foot: A pair of syllables--a stressed syllable followed by an unstressed syllable. Catalexis: The absence of a syllable in the final foot in a line. In Blake’s poem, an unstressed syllable is absent in the last foot of each line. Thus, every line has seven syllables, not the conventional eight.
The following illustration using the first two lines of the poem demonstrates tetrameter with four trochaic feet, the last one catalectic:
    .....1...........2...........3...............4TIger, | TIger, | BURN ing | BRIGHT.....1...........2...........3...............4IN the | FOR ests | OF the | NIGHT
Notice that the fourth foot in each line eliminates the conventional unstressed syllable (catalexis). However, this irregularity in the trochaic pattern does not harm the rhythm of the poem. In fact, it may actually enhance it, allowing each line to end with an accented syllable that seems to mimic the beat of the maker’s hammer on the anvil. For a detailed discussion of meter and the various types of feet, click here.
.


Structure and Rhyme Scheme The poem consists of six quatrains. (A quatrain is a four-line stanza.) Each quatrain contains two couplets. (A couplet is a pair of rhyming lines). Thus we have a 24-line poem with 12 couplets and 6 stanzas–a neat, balanced package. The question in the final stanza repeats (except for one word, dare) the wording of the first stanza, perhaps suggesting that the question Blake raises will continue to perplex thinkers ad infinitum.
Figures of Speech and Allusions
Paradox: If the maker of the tiger also made the lamb.
Metaphor: Comparison of the tiger to a fire.
Anaphora: Repetition of what at the beginning of sentences or clauses. Example: What dread hand and what dread feet? / What the hammer? what the chain?
Allusion: Immortal hand or eye: God or Satan
Allusion: Distant deeps or skies: hell or heaven
Alliteration: See poem annotations.
Symbols
The Tiger: Evil (or Satan)
The Lamb: Goodness (or God)
Distant Deeps: Hell
Skies: Heaven
.
Annotations
Alliteration
The color-coded letters in the first two stanzas give examples of alliteration.
Meaning of the Poem
Stanza 1: What immortal being created this terrifying creature which, with its perfect proportions (symmetry), is an awesome killing machine?
Stanza 2: Was it created in hell (distant deeps) or in heaven (skies)? If the creator had wings, how could he get so close to the fire in which the tiger was created? How could he work with so blazing a fire?
Stanza 3: What strength (shoulder) and craftsmanship (art) could make the tiger's heart? What being could then stand before it (feet) and shape it further (hand)?
Stanza 4: What kind of tool (hammer) did he use to fashion the tiger in the forge fire? What about the chain connected to the pedal which the maker used to pump the bellows? What of the heat in the furnace and the anvil on which the maker hammered out his creation? How did the maker muster the courage to grasp the tiger?
Stanza 5: When the stars cast their light on the new being and the clouds cried, was the maker pleased with his creation?
Stanza 6: The poet repeats the the central question of the poem, stated in Stanza 1. However, he changes could (Line 4) to dare (Line 24). This is a significant change, for the poet is no longer asking who had the capability of creating the tiger but who dared to create so frightful a creature.

Sunday, January 18, 2009

Scissors

Tijeras
Scissors

Tiger
Gen 1:4
"And God saw the light, that [it was] good: and God divided the light from the darkness."

Pro 3:12
" For whom the LORD loveth he correcteth; even as a father the son [in whom] he delighteth.
"




Puna basking in the sun
In eastern Asia, the tiger is considered the King of Beasts, representing royalty, fearlessness and wrath.
Chess: "keystone" "clave" "clue" "Eye of the Tiger"




Chess: "Keystone" "Tijeras" "Scissors" "Tiger" "clave" "clue" "Eye of the Tiger"

Scissors

Scissors are hand operated cutting instruments. They consist of a pair of metal blades connected in such a way that the blades meet and cut. Scissors are used for cutting various thin materials, such as paper, cardboard, metal foil, thin plastic, cloth, rope and wire. Scissors can also be used to cut hair and food.
It is most likely that scissors were invented in 1500 BC in ancient Egypt.[1] The earliest known scissors appeared in the Middle East 3,000 or 4,000 years ago. These were of the 'spring scissor' type comprising two bronze blades connected at the handles by a thin, curved strip of bronze. This strip served to bring the blades together when squeezed and to pull them apart when released.


Scissors from the Chinese Tang dynasty (618-907 AD)
Cross-bladed scissors were invented by the Romans around AD 100.
Pivoted scissors of bronze or iron, in which the blades were connected at a point between the tips and the handles, were used in ancient Rome, China, Japan, and Korea. Spring scissors continued to be used in Europe until the sixteenth century and the idea is still used in almost all modern scissors.

Early manufacture

During the Middle Ages and Renaissance, spring scissors were made by heating a bar of iron or steel, then flattening and shaping its ends into blades on an anvil. The center of the bar was heated, bent to form the spring, then cooled and reheated to make it flexible.
Pivoted scissors were not manufactured in large numbers until 1761, when Robert Hinchliffe produced the first pair of modern-day scissors made of hardened and polished cast steel. He lived in Cheney Square, London and was reputed to be the first person who put out a signboard proclaiming himself "fine scissor manufacturer".[2]
During the nineteenth century, scissors were hand-forged with elaborately decorated handles. They were made by hammering steel on indented surfaces known as bosses to form the blades. The rings in the handles, known as bows, were made by punching a hole in the steel and enlarging it with the pointed end of an anvil.



Fiskars scissors 1967
In a part of Sweden (now in Finland) an ironworks was started 1649 in the hamlet "Fiskars" between Helsinki and Turku. In 1830 a new owner started the first cutlery works in Finland, making, among other items, scissors with the trade mark Fiskars. Fiskars Corporation introduced new methods in the manufacturing of scissors in 1967.

Monday, December 8, 2008

"Occhi"

Ojo 
Soldier 
Tiger
Trigger
Gatillo
Disparador 
 
Jas. 1:8
"A double minded man is unstable in all his ways."
 
Proverbs 21:28
“A false witness shall perish: but the man that heareth speaketh constantly.”





 

Elephant Seal Pup, Año Nuevo
A young Elephant Seal Pup takes a break in the sun at Ano Nuevo State Natural Reserve.

Sydney Opera House and Harbor Bridge at Night, Sydney, Australia
Chess: "Trigger" "Gatillo" "Disparador""soldier" "Alaska" "ojo" "occhi" "cantilever" "eye of the tiger" "Pirates of the Caribbean" "camera" "cámara" "Kilimanjaro" "fugo fish: camarón: shrimp"









The Tiger
By William Blake
Published in 1794 in Songs of Experience

Tiger, tiger, burning bright
In the forests of the night,
What immortal hand or eye
Could frame thy fearful symmetry?


In what distant deeps or skies
Burnt the fire of thine eyes?
On what wings dare he aspire?
What the hand dare seize the fire?


And what shoulder and what art
Could twist the sinews of thy heart?
And, when thy heart began to beat,
What dread hand and what dread feet?


What the hammer? What the chain?
In what furnace was thy brain?
What the anvil? What dread grasp
Dare its deadly terrors clasp?


When the stars threw down their spears,
And water`d heaven with their tears,
Did He smile His work to see?
Did He who made the lamb make thee?


Tiger, tiger, burning bright,
In the forests of the night,
What immortal hand or eye
Dare frame thy fearful symmetry?


Theme
.......“The Tiger,” by William Blake (1757-1827), presents a question that embodies the theme: Who created the tiger? Was it the kind and loving God who made the lamb? Or was it Satan? Blake presents his question in Lines 3 and 4:
    What immortal hand or eye Could frame thy fearful symmetry?
Blake realizes, of course, that God made all the creatures on earth. However, to express his bewilderment that the God who created the gentle lamb also created the terrifying tiger, he includes Satan as a possible creator while raising his rhetorical questions, notably the one he asks in Lines 5 and 6:
    In what distant deeps or skies Burnt the fire of thy eyes?
Deeps appears to refer to hell and skies to heaven. In either case, there would be fire--the fire of hell or the fire of the stars.
.......Of course, there can be no gainsaying that the tiger symbolizes evil, or the incarnation of evil, and that the lamb (Line 20) represents goodness, or Christ. Blake's inquiry is a variation on an old philosophical and theological question: Why does evil exist in a universe created and ruled by a benevolent God? Blake provides no answer. His mission is to reflect reality in arresting images. A poet’s first purpose, after all, is to present the world and its denizens in language that stimulates the aesthetic sense; he is not to exhort or moralize. Nevertheless, the poem does stir the reader to deep thought. Here is the tiger, fierce and brutal in its quest for sustenance; there is the lamb, meek and gentle in its quest for survival. Is it possible that the same God who made the lamb also made the tiger? Or was the tiger the devil's work?
Meter
The poem is in trochaic tetrameter with catalexis at the end of each line. Here is an explanation of these technical terms:
    Tetrameter Line: a poetry line usually with eight syllables but sometimes seven. Trochaic Foot: A pair of syllables--a stressed syllable followed by an unstressed syllable. Catalexis: The absence of a syllable in the final foot in a line. In Blake’s poem, an unstressed syllable is absent in the last foot of each line. Thus, every line has seven syllables, not the conventional eight.
The following illustration using the first two lines of the poem demonstrates tetrameter with four trochaic feet, the last one catalectic:
    .....1...........2...........3...............4 TIger, | TIger, | BURN ing | BRIGHT .....1...........2...........3...............4 IN the | FOR ests | OF the | NIGHT
Notice that the fourth foot in each line eliminates the conventional unstressed syllable (catalexis). However, this irregularity in the trochaic pattern does not harm the rhythm of the poem. In fact, it may actually enhance it, allowing each line to end with an accented syllable that seems to mimic the beat of the maker’s hammer on the anvil. For a detailed discussion of meter and the various types of feet, click here.
.


Structure and Rhyme Scheme
The poem consists of six quatrains. (A quatrain is a four-line stanza.) Each quatrain contains two couplets. (A couplet is a pair of rhyming lines). Thus we have a 24-line poem with 12 couplets and 6 stanzas–a neat, balanced package. The question in the final stanza repeats (except for one word, dare) the wording of the first stanza, perhaps suggesting that the question Blake raises will continue to perplex thinkers ad infinitum.
Figures of Speech and Allusions
Paradox: If the maker of the tiger also made the lamb.
Metaphor: Comparison of the tiger to a fire.
Anaphora: Repetition of what at the beginning of sentences or clauses. Example: What dread hand and what dread feet? / What the hammer? what the chain?
Allusion: Immortal hand or eye: God or Satan
Allusion: Distant deeps or skies: hell or heaven
Alliteration: See poem annotations.
Symbols
The Tiger: Evil (or Satan)
The Lamb: Goodness (or God)
Distant Deeps: Hell
Skies: Heaven
.
Annotations
Alliteration
The color-coded letters in the first two stanzas give examples of alliteration.
Meaning of the Poem
Stanza 1: What immortal being created this terrifying creature which, with its perfect proportions (symmetry), is an awesome killing machine?
Stanza 2: Was it created in hell (distant deeps) or in heaven (skies)? If the creator had wings, how could he get so close to the fire in which the tiger was created? How could he work with so blazing a fire?
Stanza 3: What strength (shoulder) and craftsmanship (art) could make the tiger's heart? What being could then stand before it (feet) and shape it further (hand)?
Stanza 4: What kind of tool (hammer) did he use to fashion the tiger in the forge fire? What about the chain connected to the pedal which the maker used to pump the bellows? What of the heat in the furnace and the anvil on which the maker hammered out his creation? How did the maker muster the courage to grasp the tiger?
Stanza 5: When the stars cast their light on the new being and the clouds cried, was the maker pleased with his creation?
Stanza 6: The poet repeats the the central question of the poem, stated in Stanza 1. However, he changes could (Line 4) to dare (Line 24). This is a significant change, for the poet is no longer asking who had the capability of creating the tiger but who dared to create so frightful a creature.