Showing posts with label Carver. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Carver. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 7, 2026

Waterford

Waterford
Quiriguรก
Copรกn
Venice Glass 
๐†๐ข๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ž๐ญ๐ญ๐ž 
๐‚๐š๐ซ๐ฏ๐ž๐ซ 
๐†๐ฎ๐ข๐ฅ๐ฅ๐จ๐ญ๐ข๐ง๐ž 
 

๐Ÿ ๐’๐š๐ฆ๐ฎ๐ž๐ฅ ๐Ÿ:๐Ÿ
“๐“๐ก๐ž๐ซ๐ž ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ง๐จ๐ง๐ž ๐ก๐จ๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐š๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐‹๐Ž๐‘๐ƒ: ๐Ÿ๐จ๐ซ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž๐ซ๐ž ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ง๐จ๐ง๐ž ๐›๐ž๐ฌ๐ข๐๐ž ๐ญ๐ก๐ž๐ž: ๐ง๐ž๐ข๐ญ๐ก๐ž๐ซ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž๐ซ๐ž ๐š๐ง๐ฒ ๐ซ๐จ๐œ๐ค ๐ฅ๐ข๐ค๐ž ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ ๐†๐จ๐.”

 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
Waterford (Quiriguรก)
 
 
 
 
"Doge: 'Tis said that our Venetian crystal has
Such pure antipathy to poison, as
To burst, if aught of venom touches it. " ~~~BYRON: The Two Foscari, V, i
 
 



 
 
Waterford (Quiriguรก)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Waterford (Quiriguรก)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Chess: "Waterford" "Gillette" "Carver" "Guillotine" "Quiriguรก" "Copรกn" "Waterford" 
 
 
 ๐๐€๐‘๐€๐ƒ๐Ž́๐‰๐ˆ๐‚๐Ž, ๐„๐ ๐„๐‹ ๐‚๐‹๐ˆ๐Œ๐€๐— ๐ƒ๐„๐‹ ๐๐Ž๐ƒ๐„๐‘, ๐„๐—๐๐‘๐„๐’๐€๐ƒ๐Ž ๐„๐ ๐‹๐€ ๐Œ๐Ž๐๐”๐Œ๐„๐๐“๐€๐‹ ๐„๐’๐“๐„๐‹๐€ ๐„๐’ ๐’๐Ž๐‘๐๐‘๐„๐’๐ˆ๐•๐€๐Œ๐„๐๐“๐„ ๐ƒ๐„๐‘๐‘๐Ž๐“๐€๐ƒ๐Ž ๐๐Ž๐‘ ๐”๐ ๐‹๐ˆ́๐ƒ๐„๐‘ ๐ˆ๐๐…๐„๐‘๐ˆ๐Ž๐‘ ๐๐Ž๐‹๐ˆ́๐“๐ˆ๐‚๐€๐Œ๐„๐๐“๐„ ๐˜ ๐ƒ๐„๐‚๐€๐๐ˆ๐“๐€๐ƒ๐Ž. 
the episode of Uaxaclajuun Ub’aah K’awiil (18‑Conejo) is one of those moments in history that feels charged with meaning even if, strictly speaking, it belongs to the realm of political contingency.
Let me give you both readings — the chaotic and the teleological — and then the deeper synthesis that the Maya themselves would have recognized.
๐ŸŒช️ 1. The “randomness and chaos” reading
From a modern, secular, historical perspective:
Copรกn was powerful.
Quiriguรก was a vassal.
A political revolt occurred.
18‑Conejo was captured and ritually executed.
Power shifted.
In this view, it’s geopolitics:
ambition, alliances, timing, and the brutal pragmatism of Classic Maya warfare.
Nothing “meant” anything beyond the immediate political consequences.
But that’s only one lens.
๐Ÿ”ฑ 2. The teleological / symbolic reading (the Maya’s own worldview)
For the Maya, nothing of this magnitude was random.
A king was not just a ruler — he was:
the axis between worlds
the guarantor of cosmic order
the embodiment of divine legitimacy
So when a king like 18‑Conejo — who had just erected monumental stelae asserting his divine right — is suddenly captured and decapitated, the Maya would have read it as:
a rupture in cosmic balance
a sign that the gods had withdrawn favor
a reversal of sacred legitimacy
a mythic inversion: the mighty humbled, the vassal enthroned
In other words, a teleological event, not an accident.
And the irony is exquisite:
18‑Conejo builds monuments to eternal power…
and is destroyed by a rival he underestimated.
That is mythic structure, not mere politics.
๐Ÿœ‚ 3. The symbolic paradox: monuments vs. mortality
Your text describes Stela B, one of the most refined works of Maya art — a monument to permanence, divine order, and royal legitimacy.
And yet:
the king who carved eternity into stone
is erased violently
by a smaller, weaker polity
in a single stroke
This contrast is so sharp that it invites symbolic interpretation.
It’s the same paradox found in:
Ozymandias
the fall of Troy
the death of Alexander
the collapse of the Aztec empire
Civilizations often encode their own fragility in their greatest monuments.
๐Ÿœ 4. A deeper synthesis: the Maya concept of cyclical fate
The Maya did not believe in randomness.
They believed in cycles, reciprocity, cosmic debt, and the turning of the katun.
18‑Conejo’s fall fits perfectly into that worldview:
A ruler reaches the peak of divine power.
He overextends.
The cosmic balance shifts.
A subordinate rises.
The cycle resets.
This is not teleology in the Western sense (a linear purpose), but cosmic equilibrium — a universe that corrects excess.
๐ŸŒฟ 5. My appreciative reading
The event is both:
historically contingent (politics, rivalry, timing)
symbolically inevitable (hubris, cosmic correction, the fragility of power)
And the beauty is that the stela itself becomes part of the irony:
The monument meant to immortalize the king ends up immortalizing the tragedy of his fall.
That is why the story feels charged with meaning — because it is meaning, even if not in a literal teleological sense.
Jorge, this is one of those topics where the symbolic, the political, and the cosmic intertwine so tightly that you can’t pull them apart. Decapitation in Maya ritual is not just an act of violence — it is a cosmological statement, a reenactment of myth, and a transfer of sacred power.
Let me give you the layered meaning the Maya themselves would have recognized.
๐Ÿช“ 1. Decapitation as Cosmic Drama
In Maya thought, decapitation is directly tied to the myth of the Hero Twins in the Popol Vuh:
The Twins are beheaded in the underworld.
One of them, Hunahpรบ, has his head placed in a calabash tree, becoming a source of life.
Later, they decapitate the lords of Xibalba in return.
So decapitation is not annihilation — it is transformation, fertility, and cosmic renewal.
A king’s beheading echoes this mythic cycle.
๐ŸŒพ 2. The Head as the Seed
For the Maya, the head = the maize seed.
The maize god is often shown decapitated, sprouting anew.
Blood is not just blood — it is fertilizing rain.
The head is the kernel from which life returns.
Thus, decapitation is a ritual of agricultural regeneration.
When a ruler is beheaded, the act symbolically “feeds” the cosmos.
๐Ÿ‘‘ 3. The King’s Head as a Vessel of Power
The Maya believed the head contained:
k’uh (divine essence)
ch’ulel (soul-force)
legitimacy
Removing the head is not just killing the body — it is seizing the sacred charge that legitimizes rule.
This is why 18‑Conejo’s execution by Quiriguรก was so shocking:
It wasn’t just a political coup.
It was a cosmic theft of kingship.
Quiriguรก’s ruler literally appropriated the divine essence of Copรกn.
The symbolism is enormous.
๐Ÿฉธ 4. Blood as World‑Sustaining Substance
Maya kings performed bloodletting because their blood was:
food for the gods
a medium for visions
a renewal of cosmic order
Decapitation is the ultimate bloodletting — the complete offering of royal essence.
It is the king fulfilling his cosmic duty in the most absolute way.
๐Ÿชถ 5. Decapitation as Reversal of Order
When a king is beheaded, it signals:
the collapse of divine favor
the inversion of the cosmic hierarchy
the turning of the katun cycle
the rise of a new sacred center
This is why the fall of 18‑Conejo feels mythic:
a great king erects monuments to eternal power, and the cosmos answers with a ritual inversion.  
๐Ÿ”ฅ 6. The Political Layer: Humiliation and Legitimacy
In Classic Maya warfare:
Capturing a king alive was the highest achievement.
Decapitating him publicly was a declaration that the gods had switched allegiance.
The victor became the new axis mundi.
So the act is both ritual and propaganda.
๐ŸŒ˜ 7. The Aesthetic Layer: Art and Iconography
Maya art is full of:
decapitated ballplayers
the maize god reborn after beheading
rulers holding the heads of enemies
serpents emerging from severed necks (symbolizing vision and rebirth)
The message is always the same:
death is a portal, not an ending.
๐ŸŒ„ A synthesis for your symbolic sensibility
Decapitation in Maya ritual is:
cosmic renewal
agricultural regeneration
transfer of sacred power
mythic reenactment
political theater
a sign that the universe has shifted its balance
When 18‑Conejo was beheaded, it wasn’t just a king dying.
It was the cosmos changing hands.  

En el siglo VIII d.C., durante el apogeo del periodo Clรกsico maya, el poderoso gobernante Uaxaclajuun Ub'aah K'awiil —tambiรฉn conocido como “18 Conejo”— ordenรณ la construcciรณn de la majestuosa Estela B en la antigua ciudad de Copรกn, ubicada en la actual Honduras.
Esta estela, tallada alrededor del aรฑo 731 d.C., es una obra maestra de la arqueologรญa mesoamericana. Representa al gobernante con un nivel de detalle impresionante: porta un elaborado tocado ceremonial, joyas finamente esculpidas y sรญmbolos de poder divino. Cada elemento refleja la estrecha relaciรณn entre los reyes mayas y el mundo espiritual.
La Estela B no solo es un monumento polรญtico, sino tambiรฉn un testimonio del extraordinario desarrollo artรญstico de la civilizaciรณn maya. Sus relieves muestran una tรฉcnica avanzada en el tallado de piedra, con figuras en alto relieve que parecen cobrar vida. Ademรกs, contiene glifos que narran la historia del gobernante y legitiman su autoridad.
Este monumento forma parte de un conjunto de estelas erigidas en Copรกn durante un periodo de gran prosperidad. Sin embargo, el reinado de Uaxaclajuun Ub'aah K'awiil terminรณ trรกgicamente tras ser capturado y ejecutado por su rival de Quiriguรก, marcando un punto de inflexiรณn en la historia de la regiรณn.
 

Saturday, July 21, 2018

Prosciutto

Prosciutto
Salamanca
Art
Exhibit
Barbados
Beard
Moustache
Pata Negra
Serrano
Ham
Catechism
Baptize 
Carver

Prov.1:4
"To give subtilty to the simple, to the young man knowledge and discretion."


 “The Middle Ages exhibit life and color and change”~~~Charles H. Haskins


“only art can substitute for nature”~~~Leonard Bernstein
 



















 Prosciutto













Salamanca













 Super Mario, moustache













 Exhibit














 Olivia Culpo, Miss Universe 2012













 Carving knife




 Chess: "Prosciutto" "Salamanca" "Art" "Exhibit" "Barbados" "Beard" "Moustache" "Pata Negra" "Serrano" "Ham" "Catechism" "Baptize" "Carver"

Saturday, April 2, 2011

Pink

Bloom
Cherubim
Carver 
Chekhov
1Kings 6:32 
"The two doors also [were of] olive tree; and he carved upon them carvings of cherubims and palm trees and open flowers, and overlaid [them] with gold, and spread gold upon the cherubims, and upon the palm trees."




Chess: "H. Bloom" "R. Carver" "Chejov" "Cherubim"

Cathedral | Introduction

The first publication of the short story ''Cathedral'' was in the March, 1981, issue of Atlantic Monthly. It was selected to appear in The Best American Short Stories, 1982, and became the title story in the 1983 collection, Cathedral. This volume was very well-received by critics and readers alike, receiving nominations for the National Book Critics Circle Award and the Pulitzer Prize.
Many critics note a shift in Carver's work between the publication of What We Talk About When We Talk About Love and Cathedral, and many believe that Carver reached the zenith of his career with this collection. Adam Meyer, in his book, Raymond Carver, argues that ''Carver is at the height of his powers here, having arrived at his full maturity, and Cathedral as a whole is certainly the most impressive of his collections.''
"Cathedral," like many of Carver's other stories, portrays individuals isolated from each other for a variety of reasons. The narrator drinks too much and seems unable to adequately communicate with his wife. The wife has earlier tried to commit suicide because of loneliness. Only the blind man, Robert, seems able to form lasting human connections. Unlike Carver's other stories, however, "Cathedral" ends with hope; although there is no proof that the narrator will overcome his isolation, for the moment, he is in communion with himself and another human being.

Cathedral Summary

"Cathedral" opens with the narrator telling the reader in a conversational tone that a blind friend of his wife's is coming to visit them. The narrator is clearly unhappy about the upcoming visit. He then flashes back to the story of how his wife met the blind man when she worked for him as a reader. At the time, she was engaged to marry an officer in the Air Force. When she tells the blind man goodbye, he asks if he can touch her face. The touch of his fingers on her face is a pivotal moment in her life, something the narrator does not understand.
Although his wife has maintained contact with the blind man for ten years, this will be the first time she has seen him since her marriage, subsequent divorce, and remarriage. Robert, the blind man, has just lost his wife and will be traveling to Connecticut to visit with her family. Along the way he will spend the night at the home of the narrator and his wife. His wife tells the narrator that Robert and his wife, Beulah, were inseparable. "Cathedral" opens with the narrator telling the reader in a conversational tone that a blind friend of his wife's is coming to visit them. The narrator is clearly unhappy about the upcoming visit. He then flashes back to the story of how his wife met the blind man when she worked for him as a reader. At the time, she was engaged to marry an officer in the Air Force. When she tells the blind man goodbye, he asks if he can touch her face. The touch of his fingers on her face is a pivotal moment in her life, something the narrator does not understand.
Although his wife has maintained...

Bloom On Carver